WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] No network device problem in -testing

To: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] No network device problem in -testing
From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:54:20 +0100
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:06:14 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jIub3ZvKoTsi629GXt1vZFCDCgJ0eQuB7m16wdAggKgkCMbNzdwTIxVRl0Fur7DuyngQyaotmKTgykqXiB2bqYps6pTmwgRHv/47W3YRXesZI5lIAx2B8lDhDIClL0meLMUGRMc6bVl+KDrjRavUtErKAQf1Gb5xMdfjLXeA2Bk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060203220011.GB3075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5d7aca950602022143m1f9b9e75y178228dcac53fbc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <eab087540602030350n4f4ceec0s1f488b4684ad8e76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d7aca950602030551w3c2184afvbc90c0a8cfc289c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060203220011.GB3075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ewan Mellor wrote:
> This change was made on Dec 13.  Previously, the nics= option and the
> vif option interacted in unexpected ways (nics=0 did not necessarily
> mean 0 vifs, for example).  This way vif and vbd configuration behaves
> the same, and there are no concealed defaults to confuse people.

It seems that the options:
 ip="blah"
 netmask="blah"
 gateway="blah"

still work, but now they can also be specified within the vif=['']
list as vif=['ip=blah, etc'].

Is this a bug, or is there just supposed to be two ways to apply an IP
address etc. now?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel