This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] VT-x and frontend/backend drivers

To: Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] VT-x and frontend/backend drivers
From: Mark Ryden <markryde@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:49:10 +0200
Delivery-date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:55:43 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=S63nNw40PLsCYGUSqNEU7IYbD6TaML5+EEasVU0mNOeDCVVLZoMWoxA30knzpKZIgUE//uB6UM2FlO3qDVQWEEoT01Kdjy6ookL/sm5VX+jFHp7pJq/TBczAVzo3sxpVcTzZSiau4q6msod/fPAQBmJ80V8PiR05WjeSkZrAYK8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  As I saw in this mailing list, there should be some
        emulation solution for drivers when using VT-x processors.
See for example :
My question is this;
  As I understand, the VMX support in the new  VT-x processors
enables us to prevent Guest OSs from performing
unwanted instructions (HLT , for example). This is
done by using the root and non-root VMX operation.
 Thus , we don't use paravirtualization and we
can run unmodified guest.
  Is there a possibility or any intention of using the
backend-frontend solution of Xen (maybe with some fixes) when using
VT-x processors ? wouldn't it be much better in terms of
performance than using hardware emulation (based on QEMU maybe)?

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>