WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 documentation changes

To: Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0 documentation changes
From: Robb Romans <FMJ@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:44:24 -0600
Cc: Xen Devel List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:45:13 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1Ek2kU-0000un-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Steven Hand's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:06:32 +0000")
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
References: <E1Ek2kU-0000un-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "SH" == Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    >> Checking the changelog today for xen-unstable.hg, I find that
    >> some of the work that IBM has contributed to the Users' Manual
    >> and Interface Manual has been discarded.

    SH> Which work are you referring to?

:)

For example, the Users' Manual is now one 74K file. There was agreement
between us and Xen to break it into smaller chunks, and we spent the
time to do that.

    >> Would someone from Xen please be kind enough to explain why this
    >> happened?

    SH> Prior to the release we tidied up the documentation to make it
    SH> at least consistent/correct (as far as possible). It may be that
    SH> this involved removing some of your text - but cannot say as I'm
    SH> not aware what your text was (see above).

It is not "my text". It is work done by IBM that was accepted into the
tree.

The changes I'm referring to appear to have happened after the
release. My guess is that is a consequence of your internal tree being
pushed out to the open source tree.

[8305: Xen patchbot -unstable ] [Xen-changelog] Updated docs for Xen
3.0.
From: Xen patchbot -unstable <patchbot-unstable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-changelog] Updated docs for Xen 3.0.
To: xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:52:14 +0000
Reply-To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

# HG changeset patch
# User smh22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# Node ID c8fdb0caa77b429cf47f9707926e83947778cb48
# Parent  0255f48b757fc4a69846356e8f42e9a4ed410c8c
Updated docs for Xen 3.0.

Signed-off-by: Steven Hand <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<snip>

    >> What is the status of the patch that I submitted on Monday?

    SH> The patch you submitted on Monday was against an older version
    SH> of the tree and has not yet been applied.

It wasn't an older version when it was submitted.


Regards,
Robb

- -- 
Robb Romans                     (512) 838-0419
Linux Commando                  T/L   678-0419
ARS NA5TT
.-- - ..-. ..--..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFDlx94doW/RCLrCx0RAk2fAJ9T/7fI+FpSsakUAvejcMDatQjS5QCfb+Jl
GZJ8UzHshE8IFIj9WzqGfn0=
=/GgF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>