WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Daily Xen Builds

To: "Sean Dague" <sean@xxxxxxxxx>, "David F Barrera" <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Daily Xen Builds
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:01:08 -0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:01:12 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXvDPjrU1mhBH5IS4eAW0hUwWeaqQAaC5Sg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: Daily Xen Builds
 
> >             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> >               FC3pae |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> > hs20.1.rhel4-x86_32pae |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> >  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   70 |   23 |     1 |     0 |
> >  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   71 |   22 |     1 |     0 |
> >      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   70 |   23 |     1 |     0 |
> >      x235sles9nonpae |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> >           x305rh4pae |   72 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> >      x305sles9nonpae |   72 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> >           x335fc4pae |   85 |    8 |     1 |     0 |
> >     x335sles9_pae4gb |   73 |   20 |     1 |     0 |
> >  x460.fc3-x86_64-8gb |   67 |   26 |     0 |     1 |
> 
> Wow, this is a pretty major regression somewhere.  We were 
> down at about 8 fails per platform (some with much less) a week ago.  
> 
> http://xmtest.dague.org/ shows the fail rate on a steady 
> upward climb, which is not the direction we should be heading 
> right now.

Sean,

I think this is actually your bug :-)

The changes to xm-test you posted on Friday seem to have broken the
initrd such that the guest can't mount /proc, which seems to account for
the failures.

The mini XenRT run used for the staging tree still uses xm-test v0.3 as
latter versions are too slow (though I know you're working on this), and
we're not seeing these failures, hence changesets are still getting out.


Thanks,
Ian





 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>