Re: [Xen-devel] ioemu patch from Ewan Mellor (was: VMX status report Nov. 2)

[Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:27:04AM +0800, Ling, Xiaofeng wrote:

> Khoa Huynh <mailto:khoa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > "Ling, Xiaofeng" <xiaofeng.ling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/07/2005
> > 08:47:00 PM: 
> >> Khoa Huynh <mailto:khoa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The xen-unstable tree which I pulled today should have this patch,
> >>> but I still cannot create a VMX domain - same problem as before.  Am
> >>> I missing anything ? Thanks.
> >> What's distribution of your service OS?
> >> We have one machine here also have this problem, but when use "if
> >> devid == 0:" is ok, while using "if devid == -1" or "if devid
> >> isNone" has same issue. It is Redhat EL4.
> > 
> > Yes, I have verified that my Intel VT box needs "if devid == 0:" to
> > be able to create VMX domains.  This box is running Fedora Core 3. 
> > Other choices ("if devid is None" or "devid == -1") do NOT work.  
> > 
> > Is a fix for ALL distributions possible ?
> I'm not sure whether it is related with distribution, one of the machine with 
> FC3
> here has this problem some times, but not always.
> And seems xenU also has this problem(someone reported in mailing list)
> If you specify nics=1 in configure file, then can it can be reproduced on any 
> machine.
> looks like it is related with vnif when the devid of it is allocated as 0.

Can we go back to the beginning, please?  Do you actually _want_ any vifs?
Surely with VMX domains you are not using vifs at all?

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel