WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-d

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make IDE dma tranfer run in another thread inqemu)
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:22:40 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:36:15 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXbFHFzWaJ5lPVaTTyFTF2dOlZgXQAHM6iQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make IDE dma tranfer run in another thread inqemu)
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2005, at 15:18, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> 
>>      So, I think we can stick with current situation now, and revist
>> later when we rebase Qemu.
> 
> I think any damage is now done with regards to keeping tools/ioemu in
> sync with qemu, so we may as well take this patch.
This particular patch is very small and cleanly contained by #ifdef
DMA_MULTI_THREAD. In a sense it's disposable, and it won't stand out as
deviation from qemu.

> 
> At some point there will be a big restructuring of the device model
> code (moving out of dom0) and rebasing to qemu then is probably a good
> plan. If some of the changes we've made could have been pushed up to
> qemu that would have been good -- perhaps we can enforce something
> like that after a rebase.
> 
>   -- Keir
> 
I agree. 

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH][VT] Multithread IDE device model ( was: RE:[Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make IDE dma tranfer run in another thread inqemu), Nakajima, Jun <=