WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?

To: "Joakim Dahlstedt" <jda@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Stale comment about GDT indexes in arch-x86_32.h ?
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:12:46 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:04:59 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7553AA7A8AC280418AA6EC6949E0E40D063C7EE8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7553AA7A8AC280418AA6EC6949E0E40D063C7EE8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 17 Oct 2005, at 12:28, Joakim Dahlstedt wrote:

And the comment just does not make any sense to me. 1c00 or e000 had
made sense. Is this just a stale comment for an earlier version of Xen
that just should be updated or am I missing something fundamental?

Yes, the comments are stale.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>