WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: x86-64 Net Performance [was: Opteron server and NUMA]

To: Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: x86-64 Net Performance [was: Opteron server and NUMA]
From: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:07:44 +1300
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:05:11 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ho9ALg4E5VIKB84OQTeCHUS285iSO3UMFKA2HEdCCtsbVq+1Sf48Cd3uxuJBXQHWEqSn4/qTOUC0g2g9Ukfl2ZQNoky8ah2dleigBDu4TUiiY8qOu8bGFrGJk07rGdov3JNCIt6QHRsyveZ/y1/HhSckuGqPBbZyxCQlHhlmwHw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200510090046.20993.alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200510090046.20993.alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 10/9/05, Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> compiled into Debian's glibc package.  I can recompile and run that test if
> you think it's worth doing.

Very interesting number. Have you tried doing the same tests between
two different domUs or dom0 and a domU of the same type?

If you do recompile you could try the Xen TLS glibc patch. [1]
Although I'm not sure if 64bit Xen will work with this.

[1] http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenSpecificGlibc
--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>