Re: [Xen-devel] What happened?

[James Bulpin <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The other thing to watch out for is the history (hg history and web 
interface) is ordered by the date the changeset was applied to the 
repository in question rather than when it was first checked into a 
repository (the latter being the date field in the history). Changesets 
5792 to 5804 were made to the IA64 tree a while ago. They were merged 
with the main tree on Friday which is why you see a break in the date 
ordering.
James

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2005, at 14:33, <David_Wolinsky@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > What happened to xenbits… After change set 5792, it seems to be time 
> > retarded… what's the possibility of something like this breaking Xen?  
> > I ask, because I had a stable system and now its back to the state is 
> > was a week ago… (I am only sshed in so I can't give more detailed info).
> There doesn't appear to be anything wrong with xenbits. I just cloned a 
> fresh copy of it and it looks up to date.
> If you pull new changesets into an existing local repository, you do 
> need to 'hg update' to make your check-out copy match the latest version.
>  -- Keir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel