RE: [Xen-devel] HG question

[Jerone Young <jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Well we had an issue with our blades where the bios disabled the ability
for the CPU to interpert NX bit. We should have a check to see if the NX
bit is supported & remove it from pages if it's not. I'll get a patch to
the list on this.

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 09:07 -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> BTW, the current x86_64 xenlinux requires the CPUs to support NX/XD.
> It's basically a bug, but the priority is low at this point because only
> very early stepping of x86_64 CPUs don't support NX/XD as far as I know.
> 
> Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On 15 Jul 2005, at 16:31, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
> > 
> >> Is there any way to find out using mercurial if a certain patch was
> >> applied to the unstable tree or not? For example what command should
> >> I use to find out if "[PATCH] Restoring NX/XD for x86_64 xenlinux"
> >> made it into the tree or not?
> > 
> > hg -v history | grep "Restoring NX"
> > 
> >   -- Keir
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
-- 
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel