WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen repository

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen repository
From: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:27:17 +0900
Cc: Jim Greer <jbgreer@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 23 May 2005 08:26:40 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hxZ/HX15e5J/k4hLR3DjAFHxS+vDSEnlI1wUc3qRo/CotJutawc8j9d/RYbyOOqAUqNfbU8v9WGVvlyOhwyXGiP+E0VbzZ+bzyf+A6P2jgfTowB3rQero3hSAHLmzT1sFcIAyl+ozIV4rYf/NgqAiUcRcrrMUjNgNdKcOrDWn9U=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E4173@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E4173@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aq <aquynh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 5/23/05, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 21 May 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > > We're currently investigating alternatives to BK for the
> > public repos
> > > and should have an alternative up and running in a couple of weeks.
> >
> > Git?
> >
> > I am not sure I can recommend Arch any more after my
> > experience with it as the linuxbios repo.
> 
> That's useful information, thanks.
> 
> cogito (the renamed git) looks pretty 'raw' at the moment. I did of
> playing around with mercurial last night and was impressed with how much
> functionality it has in just 2k lines of python.
> 
> One option is to just have a public CVS repo, and then everyone can use
> whatever SCM tool they prefer as pretty much everything has an 'import
> from CVS' feature. The only dowsnide to this is CVS's inability to
> represent the current branch structure.
> 

how about using subversion instead of CVS?

one drawback of using Mercurial is that it is not that stable. as far
as i know, nobody is using it now (?). so it is pretty risky to use
Mercurial as a long term solution for Xen.

regards,
aq

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel