 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] minor gcc4 fixes
| To: | "Jerone Young" <jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Xen-devel] minor gcc4 fixes |
| From: | "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:57:08 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:57:04 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcU+xZgQDZzw+XfhTxmwA8XnzhWiVQAAnoyg |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] minor gcc4 fixes |
> These patches initialize unsigned longs that are used in xen. > GCC4 complains about using unsigned longs that are not > initialized before use. Are any of these actually bug fixes, or simply work arrounds for some bizzare ggc4 behaviour? Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] minor gcc4 fixes, Jerone Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Suggested changes to xen/include from recent Linux, Hollis Blanchard |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] minor gcc4 fixes, Jerone Young |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] minor gcc4 fixes, Jerone Young |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
