Hmmm.. one cheap way to get around this and keep things nice for cross
compiling is to to include thek Rules.mk file at the top level of the
tools directory and have something like
ifeq ($(XEN_TARGET_ARCH),x86_32)
LDLIBS= $(BXLIBS) -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXpm -lstdc++ -
L ../../../tools/libxc -L ../../../tools/libxutil -lxc -lxutil -lpthread
-lncurses_32)
endif
ifeq ($(XEN_TARGET_ARCH),x86_64)
DLIBS= $(BXLIBS) -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lX11 -lXpm -lstdc++ -
L ../../../tools/libxc -L ../../../tools/libxutil -lxc -lxutil -lpthread
-lncurses
endif
This is cheap and easy way to get around the problem.
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 15:00 -0800, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On 3/22/2005 1:10 PM, Jerone Young wrote:
> > I cleaned up the top level makefile in the tools directory. No major
> > changes. Except I have it so that ioemmu is compiled only with x86_32.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We've been using the attached patch internally. The patch breaks x86_32. I'd
> appreciate help from someone who groks makefiles better than I do in fixing
> up the lib vs lib64 part.
>
> -Arun
> plain text document attachment (ioemu-x86-64.patch)
> ===== tools/ioemu/iodev/Makefile 1.4 vs edited =====
> --- 1.4/tools/ioemu/iodev/Makefile 2005-02-14 16:54:33 -08:00
> +++ edited/tools/ioemu/iodev/Makefile 2005-03-22 14:51:13 -08:00
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> CXXFLAGS=-I. -I../include -I..
> OBJS=$(patsubst %.cc,%.o,$(wildcard *.cc))
> BXLIBS = ../gui/libgui.a ../memory/libmemory.a
> -LDLIBS= $(BXLIBS) -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXpm -lstdc++ -L
> ../../../tools/libxc -L ../../../tools/libxutil -lxc -lxutil -lpthread
> -lncurses
> +LDLIBS= $(BXLIBS) -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lX11 -lXpm -lstdc++ -L
> ../../../tools/libxc -L ../../../tools/libxutil -lxc -lxutil -lpthread
> -lncurses
>
> all: device-model
>
> ===== tools/ioemu/iodev/cpu.cc 1.6 vs edited =====
> --- 1.6/tools/ioemu/iodev/cpu.cc 2005-02-08 15:57:15 -08:00
> +++ edited/tools/ioemu/iodev/cpu.cc 2005-03-22 14:48:34 -08:00
> @@ -102,20 +102,20 @@
>
> for (i = 0; i < req->count; i++) {
> tmp = BX_INP(req->addr, req->size);
> - BX_MEM_WRITE_PHYSICAL((Bit32u)
> req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size),
> + BX_MEM_WRITE_PHYSICAL((dma_addr_t)
> req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size),
> req->size, &tmp);
> }
> }
> } else if(req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE) {
> if (!req->pdata_valid) {
> - BX_OUTP(req->addr, (Bit32u) req->u.data,
> req->size);
> + BX_OUTP(req->addr, (dma_addr_t) req->u.data,
> req->size);
> } else {
> for (i = 0; i < req->count; i++) {
> unsigned long tmp;
>
> - BX_MEM_READ_PHYSICAL((Bit32u)
> req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size), req->size,
> + BX_MEM_READ_PHYSICAL((dma_addr_t)
> req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size), req->size,
> &tmp);
> - BX_OUTP(req->addr, (Bit32u) tmp,
> req->size);
> + BX_OUTP(req->addr, (dma_addr_t) tmp,
> req->size);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -133,12 +133,12 @@
> //BX_INFO(("<READ>addr:%llx, pdata:%llx, size:
> %x, count: %x\n", req->addr, req->u.pdata, req->size, req->count));
> for (i = 0; i < req->count; i++) {
> BX_MEM_READ_PHYSICAL(req->addr + (sign
> * i * req->size), req->size, &tmp);
> - BX_MEM_WRITE_PHYSICAL((Bit32u)
> req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size), req->size, &tmp);
> + BX_MEM_WRITE_PHYSICAL((dma_addr_t)
> req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size), req->size, &tmp);
> }
> } else if (req->dir == IOREQ_WRITE) {
> //BX_INFO(("<WRITE>addr:%llx, pdata:%llx, size:
> %x, count: %x\n", req->addr, req->u.pdata, req->size, req->count));
> for (i = 0; i < req->count; i++) {
> -
> BX_MEM_READ_PHYSICAL((Bit32u)req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size),
> req->size, &tmp);
> +
> BX_MEM_READ_PHYSICAL((dma_addr_t)req->u.pdata + (sign * i * req->size),
> req->size, &tmp);
> BX_MEM_WRITE_PHYSICAL(req->addr + (sign
> * i * req->size), req->size, &tmp);
> }
> }
> @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef __i386__
> static __inline__ void set_bit(long nr, volatile void *addr)
> {
> __asm__ __volatile__( "lock ; "
> @@ -254,6 +255,18 @@
>
> return;
> }
> +#else
> +/* XXX: clean for IPF */
> +static __inline__ void set_bit(long nr, volatile void *addr)
> +{
> + __asm__ __volatile__( "lock ; "
> + "btsq %1,%0"
> + :"=m" ((*(volatile long *)addr))
> + :"Ir" (nr));
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> void
> bx_cpu_c::interrupt(Bit8u vector)
> ===== tools/ioemu/memory/memory.cc 1.1 vs edited =====
> --- 1.1/tools/ioemu/memory/memory.cc 2005-01-10 14:19:25 -08:00
> +++ edited/tools/ioemu/memory/memory.cc 2005-03-22 14:48:34 -08:00
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> #if BX_PROVIDE_CPU_MEMORY
>
> void BX_CPP_AttrRegparmN(3)
> -BX_MEM_C::writePhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, Bit32u addr, unsigned len, void
> *data)
> +BX_MEM_C::writePhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, dma_addr_t addr, unsigned len,
> void *data)
> {
> Bit8u *data_ptr;
> Bit32u a20addr;
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
>
>
> void BX_CPP_AttrRegparmN(3)
> -BX_MEM_C::readPhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, Bit32u addr, unsigned len, void
> *data)
> +BX_MEM_C::readPhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, dma_addr_t addr, unsigned len,
> void *data)
> {
> Bit8u *data_ptr;
> Bit32u a20addr;
> ===== tools/ioemu/memory/memory.h 1.1 vs edited =====
> --- 1.1/tools/ioemu/memory/memory.h 2005-01-10 14:19:25 -08:00
> +++ edited/tools/ioemu/memory/memory.h 2005-03-22 14:48:35 -08:00
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
> # define BX_MEM_THIS this->
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(__i386__)
> +typedef Bit32u dma_addr_t;
> +#elif defined(__x86_64__)
> +typedef Bit64u dma_addr_t;
> +#endif
> +
> // alignment of memory vector, must be a power of 2
> #define BX_MEM_VECTOR_ALIGN 4096
>
> @@ -64,9 +70,9 @@
> ~BX_MEM_C(void);
> BX_MEM_SMF void alloc_vector_aligned (size_t bytes, size_t alignment)
> BX_CPP_AttrRegparmN(2);
> BX_MEM_SMF void init_memory(int memsize);
> - BX_MEM_SMF void readPhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, Bit32u addr,
> + BX_MEM_SMF void readPhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, dma_addr_t addr,
> unsigned len, void *data)
> BX_CPP_AttrRegparmN(3);
> - BX_MEM_SMF void writePhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, Bit32u addr,
> + BX_MEM_SMF void writePhysicalPage(BX_CPU_C *cpu, dma_addr_t addr,
> unsigned len, void *data)
> BX_CPP_AttrRegparmN(3);
> BX_MEM_SMF void load_ROM(const char *path, Bit32u romaddress, Bit8u
> type);
> BX_MEM_SMF Bit32u get_memory_in_k(void);
--
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded DevCon 2005
Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the latest Windows
Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications & content. Register
by 3/29 & save $300 http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6883&alloc_id=15149&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Home