WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)

Jeremy Katz wrote:

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:18 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Do you have a suggestion for an alternative? I know there are a number of binding-generators but I thought Pyrex was the most widely used.

Pyrex is probably the most generally used -- the stuff pygtk uses is
nice, but not very general.

In most cases, though, bindings done by hand end up being higher quality
than something that's just being generated.
I was afraid that that would be your answer.

I would really like to automatically generate the bindings. There is more C code in the current libxc/libxu python bindings than all of vm-tools.

gcc4 is still a bit off and I imagine that Pyrex will be updated as needed. If it ever proves to be painful to deal with, I'll break down and add bindings by hand. Does that seem like a reasonable plan moving forward?

Regards,
Anthony Liguori

Jeremy





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>