On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Mark Williamson wrote:
> > Besides, if the debian bits are added to bitkeeper, then I can't ever check
> > things in to them(I'm not allowed to use bitkeeper, because I work on
> > dpkg-source).
>
> I think we'd find it useful ourselves to have .deb build targets in the tree,
> if you're willing. Can't you just send patches to update it as you have been
> doing?
I could, but it'd be difficult. The various changes needed to make policy
compliant debs that don't make sense upstream, would mean either that debian/*
would be different in bitkeeper as compared to debian.org, or that what was in
bitkeeper debian/* wouldn't build, as they'd attempt to do things that
upstream doesn't have applied.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Home