| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen-stable vs. xen-testing
> a) how stable is "testing" really?
Should be pretty good, on average. It's just smallish updates & fixes to the
stable 2.0 tree. Nothing controversial is likely to go in there.
> b) can I just build new kernels from the -testing tree or should I build
> the Xen VMM as well?
The plan is that interfaces will not change for the whole 2.x series, so I
think it should work without rebuilding Xen. Of course, the Xen in -testing
will contain some fixes + features itself... ;-)
> d) I realize that Xen is really still R&D for the most part, but how do
> the Xen team feel about security issues like this?
Security of Xen itself and the XenLinux patch are extremely important to us.
Ensuring that people can use an up-to-date mainline kernel (which may
incorporate security fixes) is also quite a high priority.
The actual patches to fix generic Linux vulnerabilities are left to mainline
developers or distributors, however.
Cheers,
Mark
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home