Re: [Xen-devel] Testing Xen for CERN

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:13:50 +0100
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The negatives relative to some of the other VMMs are:
>  1 requires guest OS to be ported
>  2 poor documentation 
>  3 weak support for CoW sparse virtual disks
> 
> Point 1 you'll have to live with. We hope the community will fix
> 2. A solution to point 3 already exists but needs to be
> integrated.

Hi Rune, 

Concerning point 1, an important point is that it is just the kernel
that needs to be ported (I don't know about the Windows XP port). And
most of the patches are in the architecture dependent or memory parts
which means a lot of other kernel patches can coexist with the patch! 
(i.e., not as bad as it sounds)

Tim


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Network questions, Xiaofang Chen

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] TOT doesn't link with debugging on, Kip Macy

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Testing Xen for CERN, Ian Pratt

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] twisted consoles, Brian Wolfe

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]