Re: [Xen-devel] Tiny patch for 2004 04 08 unstable tarball. arch

> Tiny patch. :)  Compile fails if you turn off priviliged access in the
> xenolinux config.

Cheers.

There's an argument for doing away with the option
altogether. Xen enforces the protection, so it doesn't matter
whether untrusted domains are compiled with
CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST or not. The amount of code that this
option compiles out is likely less than 1KB, so it's probably
not worth having. 

However, we should make sure that the domain hides the various
proc files if it has insufficient privilege from Xen, so as to
avoid confusing users.

Ian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] resend of diff., Brian Wolfe

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] new IO layer, dev expoting and my plans for using xen. (WAS: Tiny Patch), Brian Wolfe

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Tiny patch for 2004 04 08 unstable tarball. arch/xen/kernel/time.c, Brian Wolfe

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] new IO layer, dev expoting and my plans for using xen. (WAS: Tiny Patch), Brian Wolfe

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Tiny patch for 2004 04 08 unstable tarball. arch/xen/ker