WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-cim

RE: [Xen-cim] Xen_HostedComputerSystem and miscellanous patch

To: "Gareth S Bestor" <bestor@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-cim] Xen_HostedComputerSystem and miscellanous patch
From: "Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:57:04 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 May 2006 04:57:27 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: xen-cim mailing list <xen-cim.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-cim@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZ6PGE8Sx9xFaQZTLCqsIixE4klIgANV8VQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-cim] Xen_HostedComputerSystem and miscellanous patch
Gareth,
So, will it be all right to move similar patches to the other XenHostedXXXX files (like XenHostedDisk etc)?
What can we start working on next?
Any comments on the Gap document?
thanks
Raj


From: Gareth S Bestor [mailto:bestor@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:36 AM
To: Subrahmanian, Raj; xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-cim] Xen_HostedComputerSystem and miscellanous patch


All these patches are appropriate, and great! Thanks!!

- Changes Xen_HostedComputerSystem.c to
                - Decide the targetclass by using CMClassNameIsA rather than strcmp


Yup - this is the correct approach. I must confess that Xen_HostedComputerSystem was one of the first associations I coded up (quickly)
and I did the class comparison the quick-and-dirty strcmp way [well, OK, I did know *precisely* the target classname that our in-house mgmt app
would be using, so I guess it wasnt THAT dirty...]. Some of the later association providers do the classname check correctly, as above.

Jim - Can you/are you committing these patches? If you recall, I can only commit patches coming from IBM...

- Gareth

Dr. Gareth S. Bestor
IBM Linux Technology Center
M/S DES2-01
15300 SW Koll Parkway, Beaverton, OR 97006
503-578-3186, T/L 775-3186, Fax 503-578-3186



"Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

05/17/2006 01:34 PM

To
<xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[Xen-cim] Xen_HostedComputerSystem and miscellanous patch





This patch contains the following changes
- Changes Xen_ComputerSystem.mof to inherit from CIM_ComputerSystem
rather than CIM_VirtualComputerSystem
- Changes Xen_HostedComputerSystem.mof to make the antecedent
CIM_ComputerSystem, rather than Linux_ComputerSystem
- Changes Xen_HostedComputerSystem.c to
                - Decide the targetclass by using CMClassNameIsA rather than
strcmp
                - Eliminate the Xen_ComputerSystem from the classes returned
from the CIMOM. I did this by returning only those classes that do not
match the source class rather than returning the class that exactly
match the target class
Raj
_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim