|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-changelog
[Xen-changelog] [linux-2.6.18-xen] xenfb: Only start one xenfb kthread
# HG changeset patch
# User Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
# Date 1259848386 0
# Node ID 2641f0d17eaa22811883aee22f399db46cbff06f
# Parent ff5ea1801bd3f5857c095c760f04dfab787f8c1d
xenfb: Only start one xenfb kthread
When doing save/restore testing with the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree it
was discovered that every time a restore happened we would get a new
xenfb thread. While the framebuffer continues to work, this is an
obvious resource leak. The attached patch only starts up a new xenfb
thread the first time the backend connects, and continues to re-use
that in the future. Jeremy's upstream LKML tree doesn't suffer from
this since it uses a completely different mechanism to do screen
updates. Original patch from John Haxby @ Oracle; slightly modified
by me to apply to the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/xen/fbfront/xenfb.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -r ff5ea1801bd3 -r 2641f0d17eaa drivers/xen/fbfront/xenfb.c
--- a/drivers/xen/fbfront/xenfb.c Tue Dec 01 14:02:52 2009 +0000
+++ b/drivers/xen/fbfront/xenfb.c Thu Dec 03 13:53:06 2009 +0000
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static void xenfb_backend_changed(struct
"request-update", "%d", &val) < 0)
val = 0;
- if (val){
+ if (val && !info->kthread) {
info->kthread = kthread_run(xenfb_thread, info,
"xenfb thread");
if (IS_ERR(info->kthread)) {
_______________________________________________
Xen-changelog mailing list
Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-changelog] [linux-2.6.18-xen] xenfb: Only start one xenfb kthread,
Xen patchbot-linux-2.6.18-xen <=
|
|
|
|
|