RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by enabling allocation of 0 bytes

[Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dave,

The fix to the allocator depends on some earlier patches I have sent out.  
Shall I put all of them in one big patch?  Or just point out which earlier 
patches it depends on?  The following is an excerpt from my series-file.  Do 
the patch-names survive the publication by email somewhere?

stdext-fun_mapext_opt
mlvm-refactor
fun-application
listext-take-tails
opt-join
allocator-fix-zero-alloc

Matthias.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Scott 
Sent: 08 February 2010 13:29
To: Matthias Goergens; xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by enabling 
allocation of 0 bytes

Hi Matthias,

I didn't manage to apply this patch. Perhaps I'm missing an intermediate patch? 
Could you send me another version which applies to the current tip of the repo?

Thanks,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-api-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthias Görgens
> Sent: 02 February 2010 16:22
> To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by enabling
> allocation of 0 bytes
> 
> `normalize' and `alloc_specified_area' no longer get confused by 0 byte
> allocations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> (Mercurial doesn't like Umlaute.)
> 
> 
>  mlvm/allocator.ml |  66 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api