 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] dedicated interface
| To: | <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] dedicated interface |
| From: | <bwang@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:10:02 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:12:25 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Is there anyway to bind to a dedicated interface without modifying the pci hardware stuff? Right now I have : eth1 -> vif1.1 -> breth1 -> peth1. Is it possible to eliminate the pass through vif1.1 and breth1 directly to peth1? Reason I can't use the pci work around is that the peth1 is a modified tuntap interface and does not exist as a pci hardware device. Thanks, Ben Wang DRS Defense Solutions bwang@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen document day (Oct 12 or 26), Joseph Glanville |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Fresh ubuntu/11.10 install with xen/4.1; virsh doesn't run, Boris Derzhavets |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Fresh ubuntu/11.10 install with xen/4.1; virsh doesn't run, Richard Broberg |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] dedicated interface, Mike Viau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
