WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Qemu/Bios/Devices different in xm and xl?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Qemu/Bios/Devices different in xm and xl?
From: Carsten from Virtastic <carsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:32:34 +0100
Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:34:21 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=virtastic.com; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; s=selector1; bh=qj/0TkSOIfLufb45e/D7MZiuHVo=; b= fo9Gc7cqIfkAja8GRHFi7JpN+OgLwzU/rP0LMQhHOAJ9dkB0zLeIqLS0/P9Gym04 LfJKbYUVoVFFEzFC/mZWsOFyNAjpj8f+oE/QoVQYdKQPq+3KB6BiCSPtlb99ux3r ui6YVrAT2moZo+moQYo03EtEcKP0paBhbHv2F6Je1jA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=virtastic.com; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; q=dns; s=selector1; b=M2ZIp79kmoPQP/Hm1Y3VGE/w njl1BEMoTKVv2WkQhOqkVD8Zzfrn5BngHiIcPqTwt8ZvEoCavCzlXMlP9J9DB31B fSKo99olSNlmcyHXJvcGIPHrAxmXzWWDw8KRnX7NTHu7kNJ2eHI/fPEzqUnc86Qj HjAjdUtsP5iz+Eevvkg=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi guys,

I've just migrated a bunch of servers from CentOS 5.6 / Xen 3.4.3 to CentOS 6.0 
/ Xen 4.1.1  (Kernel 2.6.32.43 w/ pvops, "Jeremy Edition" :))

For some guests, in particular FreeBSD HVM guests, I notice a difference 
between "xm" and "xl", more precisely they fail to detect the second block 
device (LVM backend) with "xl" and terminate with kernel panic, whereas they 
start just fine with "xm". Now, "xm" is going to be deprecated soon. 

Does anyone know what the actual difference is? This is the domain 
configuration, which should be easy and straight-forward enough...

======

kernel = "/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"
builder='hvm'
device_model = '/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm'

memory = 2048
name = "db2"

vif = [ 'bridge=xenbr0.127', 'bridge=xenbr1.127' ]
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/disk2/db2.root,hda,w', 
         'phy:/dev/disk2/db2.mysql,hdb,w' ]
vcpus = 2

vnc=1
vnclisten="0.0.0.0"
vncdisplay=3
serial='pty'

======

Guest is running FreeBSD 8.2, XENHVM-kernel, amd64 (or x86_64 in Linux terms)

The whole issue is not critical at the moment, because I can still fire the 
guests up with "xm", but I'd rather stick to the recommendations/standards, 
which would be "xl" for Xen 4.1+.

Thanks guys!

Cheers
Carsten





_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>