WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Trouble with manual bridging on Xen3/CentOS 5

To: Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Trouble with manual bridging on Xen3/CentOS 5
From: Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 12:53:01 +0800
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:53:59 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tvNW3BmZzbUfASs6xmXahcA9wAIZ1hUzXyf6+T2o8s4=; b=qoA21xR4PkgtHvsT/3AbIc8AmLUmr4kS9IkQzCD8jmeCnesrhpAuR7TJxXYnvDX3WV AO6gIDSN6qpLILQd5K5SX3MRK9KRDoJVzfVNW2P05NTf+grkb+LUuR0Su6x/ShuvgTui Ua4aQga/xHgEohqwNpM7aHnO5IoTGNAnUjJS8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lK4NFh5Wtg0u4+THlmQnwUlKCqn+c1QOEp5JHlENpTxEHoDVCB6XIWml3DQmogehlA KEgjxRo/gN4PinLIF4iwAHIrxlH279KKdBOdvLyUkOi3+bQ732X7SXrz4U5f+6ZOWgj1 QHDdqh9md8zS7G6AvwWrDvaEKbnY7UG1Zwih4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4DBCBFB5.7070700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4DBB36EA.2030202@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTimE1YDM86_rYj6PHWqgDyRa1gQoHw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBC3DCE.4060206@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTi=Gjp7OdfTyF7DE9SVZ3uFn2W5uxA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBC7FE2.8010609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTin0YEz0HDvnGYJ4Dt5pWRAGeaR61Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DBCBFB5.7070700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/30/2011 08:47 PM, Teck Choon Giam wrote:
>> Pasi is right about to use system network configuration so that xend
>> and system network are separated.  Can you explain how it was bugged?
>> Is it sometimes get set and sometimes not?  Have you try to give a
>> small sleep interval such as 3 seconds before setting the related mtu?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> Sure.
>
>  I've got three interfaces in my server;
> - eth0; Internet-facing, bridged as xenbr0
> - eth1; Storage network, not bridged or used by any domU.
> - eth2; Back-channel/internal network, bridged as xenbr2, used by some domU.
>
>  I had a patch[1] in xen-network-common.sh's setup_bridge_port()
> function that would look at the $dev passed in, parse it and pull the
> MTU from the corresponding bridge. The bug was that this $dev matched
> the ethX device in the domU rather than the bridge, so when the second
> interface (xenbr2 <-> domU's eth1) would look for the MTU of 'xenbr1',
> which didn't exist.

Your domUs are all HVM or PV or both in mix with the same problem?

Thanks.

Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users