WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dustin.Henning@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
From: John McMonagle <johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:39:33 -0500
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:40:58 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <002401cbf38e$bb8dd050$32a970f0$@Henning@prd-inc.com>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Advocap Inc
References: <201103031659.33950.johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx> <201104041622.02274.johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx> <002401cbf38e$bb8dd050$32a970f0$@Henning@prd-inc.com>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
Windows firewall seems to only be a problem in XP.

John


On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 07:41:06 am Dustin Henning wrote:
>       SEP uses a crappy network driver (I can't remember what it's called,
> but you're lucky it uninstalled properly, I had fits getting it off of some
> of our real machines).  Any AV that doesn't include firewall shouldn't
> cause this problem, and it's hard telling whether there is any AV that
> does firewall and wouldn't.  The latter seems unlikely, though, if even
> the Windows firewall is causing it.
>       Dustin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John McMonagle
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 17:22
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Dustin.Henning@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
> 
> I think I have at have  figured out this issue.
> 
> The main problem was using Symantic sep.
> Under XP removing sep and disabling windows firewall speed up by a factor
> of
> 
> about 8.  Doing just one or the other had little affect.
> 
> Under server server 2003 or 2008 speed went up by a factor of about 2 - 3.
> 
> Anyone have any recommendations  on antivirus for server 2003 and 2008 or a
> link to some competent unbiased tests?
> 
> I mostly do linux and deal with windows that much.
> Thanks for all the help.
> 
> John
> 
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 03:21:47 pm John McMonagle wrote:
> > Dustin
> > 
> > This is 4 of 8 real cores.
> > 
> > I started with 2.
> > Like to start testing a bit underpowered to see how things work.
> > Is there an issue with multiple cores or changing the number of cores?
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 02:58:37 pm Dustin Henning wrote:
> > > John,
> > > 
> > >   I am running an 0.9.x version of GPLPV, so forgive me if I am not up
> > > 
> > > to date on this, but in that version, having more than 1 core
> > > significantly slowed down WindowsXP.  If this is still the case, and if
> > > it transfers to Server 2003, then you might find better performance
> > > with 1 core, and if it shouldn't still be true, then you might have
> > > found a new problem with the GPLPV driver.  Another possibility is
> > > that the additional virtual cores are being pinned to hyperthreads
> > > instead of
> 
> real
> 
> > > cores or something.  I am making these suggestions under the assumption
> > > that you know making 4 virtual cores on 2 real cores host would degrade
> > > performance for obvious reasons. Dustin
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John McMonagle [mailto:johnm@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 15:51
> > > To: Dustin.Henning@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
> > > 
> > > Guess I'm mostly used to linux.
> > > iperf is a very simple tests and doesn't take good of hardware to get
> > > close to
> > > 1gbits/sec with gbit  ethernet.
> > > 
> > > This machine will primarily do terminal services. it will access some
> > > files on
> > > Linux server.
> > > We are a linux shop and that allows us to run some widows apps while
> > > keeping
> > > 
> > > all the users on linux terminals.
> > > 
> > > Did a test of the current server 2003 real server and it's getting 230
> > > Mbits
> > > 
> > > /second.
> > > Odds are the 160Mbits/second with SEP running will be Ok but I'd like
> > > to do better.
> > > Watching Resource monitor in server 2008 cpu goes to 100% while running
> > > tests.
> > > Dom0 stays at 0%.
> > > 
> > > Ran into another strange thing.
> > > I tried changing vcpus  from  from 2 to 4.
> > > my networks speed dropped to 74 Mbits/s
> > > 
> > > If I revert back to 2 it comes back to 160.
> > > What can cause that?
> > > I have not activate yet in case that matters.
> > > 
> > > John
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:37:25 am Dustin Henning wrote:
> > > > 1) SEP adds a network layer, it is going to slow you down, this is
> > > > going
> > > 
> > > to
> > > 
> > > > be amplified HVM processor virtualization.
> > > > 2) You're calling 318 Mbit/sec "usable" on Windows?  Really?  That's
> > > > impressive on Windows unless you have a 10 Gbit NIC.
> > > > The only suggestion I would have for your scenario is don't
> 
> virtualize.
> 
> > > > I'm sure that's not what you want to hear, but I think you're asking
> > > > too much. Dustin
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
> > > > McMonagle Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:30
> > > > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Slow windows network with gplpv driver.
> > > > 
> > > > On Friday, March 04, 2011 02:32:25 pm John McMonagle wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 03 March 2011 09:13:39 pm John McMonagle wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, March 03, 2011 05:57:21 pm you wrote:
> > > > > > > > Just did a test with 32 bit xp with 0.11.0.238 drive.
> > > > > > > > it show device as Xen Net device driver.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Iperf gives 14.7 Mbits/sec
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Running an xp live boot cd  get 13.6 Mbits/sec
> > > > > > > > Doesn't looks like the the pv driver is doing anything to
> > > > > > > > help the
> > > > > 
> > > > > I tried on a AMD server  and it was about the same percentage
> > > > > improvement. The only thing that had any noticeable affect was
> > > > > stopping the windows firewall.
> > > > > Had no change with  /PATCHTPR or  disable checksum offloading and
> > > > > large send offloading.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The application seemed a bit more responsive I'll see what the
> > > > > users
> > > 
> > > say.
> > > 
> > > > > I'll try to install server 2008 next week and see what happens with
> > > 
> > > that.
> > > 
> > > > > Any one know any tricks to get single user Windows apps to behave
> > > > > in a multi user environment?
> > > > > 
> > > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > I finally did an install of server 2008 on the same xen dom0.
> > > > Before installing pv drivers get 43 Mbit/sec.
> > > > better than double xp.
> > > > 
> > > > With pv driver 328 Mbit/sec.
> > > > Not spectacular but usable.
> > > > 
> > > > Then I installed Synaptic Endpoint Protection.
> > > > That brought me back to 162 Mbit/sec.
> > > > 
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > > > 
> > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>