|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Linux DomU vs Bare Metal performance issues
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2010 22:18, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Watts
>> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:40 PM
>> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [Xen-users] Linux DomU vs Bare Metal performance issues
>>
>> Can anyone shed any light on why I see such a drop in performance
> between these
>> two servers? I could understand, to an extent, seeing the DomU getting
> 3/4 of the
>> performance of the bare metal server given it has one CPU less, but
> this is less than
>> 1/2 the performance.
>
> Understand what you're really testing here is the performance of the
> virtual network driver, since Apache does almost no work to serve a
> simple static page. You're exercising the TCP stack and network drivers
> more than anything else.
Sure, but iperf shows near-enough line speed in both directions.
Shouldn't this 'prove' the virtual network driver is up to scratch for
this system?
> Out of curiosity, can you easily run the same test against dom0? The
> dom0 runs a Xen kernel, on top of the hypervisor, but with a physical
> network interface (rather than virtual).
I can, certainly.
> One thing you can try is to pin the dom0 and/or domU to a physical core,
> using "xm vcpu-pin". That gave me better throughput on some of my
> tests.
Dom-0 is already pinned to one CPU with the Dom-U given the remaining three.
> (I have doubts that hyperthreading scales as well as multicore
> processors, however I don't have any hyperthreaded systems of my own to
> test.)
I can certainly try this again with HT switched off on both boxes,
although that'll have to wait 'till monday.
Mark.
- --
Mark Watts, BSc RHCE
http://www.linux-corner.info/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM+fduAAoJEA67+nBFe32mpIYIALk6PrqhwqIQquq3gma6wGcl
VCSHXYo/ZiZlAT/jTwYvY7qoR0CQ32VBipWoQnYoDRLKPMxhXS3Nt+AHeflW0ucG
mx2lwFfqFf9aftDWMPqlHUOzZoMulDIloXObvzcfUVEHOzuyInlIo3WRnImUoC+U
YAOes8ohiyDP823fRukXIH/JkCDNOrXquoB7tqtls4Q4KOOb5EwPnZ/BJDivIGpK
IFNn3s3paN7F0quRYFFDM3j/dcZf8Jh8rJOY3XZ8Y06YCl1sAIsbOeTwFhfmglYn
qspf9EYGqnUJ8w+GLlkWT7znmTH30Xr+87z/LE2/w/4sxN+SUti3D2reI/yniJ0=
=RtOZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|