Re: [Xen-users] Dom0-Domu Communication

To:	Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Dom0-Domu Communication
From:	David Cemin <davidcemin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:04:52 -0200
Cc:	xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:06:35 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N3BE1cukvUVv8qz6Mhh2WKKLE65d5XXEPFULvA76f7w=; b=V+3sEnC2H1wcSAak49CyT1Fc+9QbLOpuJ5AxZjLwPO40ilFESnqA9jwKa+hhrT0tpt 8RfS+BYEkv/kkc3x6e+Cn08EBYvwDCPX6gl0nbHRu2IuWANWJkkXgY0Jv4ai5DSEDlkP 2rX/i65rPOZmHGWRoju9DIpAyqIehj3M5J4PI=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Ix+Vghgui0RT0/hM+Ft6lsvUpH4CQKwCB6kFHy835QRQWcRBHz6IsDbmWdZhl/a746 HRzqMZOTZ6xHI6wDl8pgOxzwN0fZ5vXHnZIAeeHmiFzRMHIgS0ujxA1+2X3zU+MeNKWV Zh3spt5DIeE4U6E7Q9y1n0QG/eHbC3zAdtguo=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4CEAAEC9.8080402@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<AANLkTi=RGRFqTw=yX2jEY0D_yAcp6OaZme0rap9U+ZOY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CEAA507.3070400@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTike8xvDz5HhkzNKcodzicbTGGu9upRL3p9QFTqQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CEAAD0E.9040006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin55gg2cWDxXvJvr6QaWGbo-1uOEtBhE4mpEKN5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CEAAEC9.8080402@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

dom0:

# iptables-save

# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Mon Nov 22 16:06:31 2010

*filter

:INPUT ACCEPT [1324:790913]

:FORWARD ACCEPT [3389:341110]

:OUTPUT ACCEPT [1656:273098]

-A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -m physdev --physdev-out vif2.0 -j ACCEPT

-A FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-in vif2.0 -j ACCEPT

-A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -m physdev --physdev-out vif1.0 -j ACCEPT

-A FORWARD -m physdev --physdev-in vif1.0 -j ACCEPT

COMMIT

# Completed on Mon Nov 22 16:06:31 2010

dom1:

root@xen-hypervisor:~# iptables-save

# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Mon Nov 22 18:03:46 2010

*filter

:INPUT ACCEPT [4002:941999]

:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]

:OUTPUT ACCEPT [198:10662]

COMMIT

# Completed on Mon Nov 22 18:03:46 2010

dom3:

root@xen-hypervisor:~# iptables-save

# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Mon Nov 22 18:05:16 2010

*filter

:INPUT ACCEPT [504:496131]

:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]

:OUTPUT ACCEPT [217:11648]

COMMIT

# Completed on Mon Nov 22 18:05:16 2010

Thank you!

David

2010/11/22 Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/22/2010 12:52 PM, David Cemin wrote:

Yes, I´ve done that:

root@xen-hypervisor:~# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3e:63:29:ab

But it appears that the link to dom1 inside dom0 is wrong:

vif1.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 addr: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Link

Am I right? If yes, it is configurable through xend-config.sxp ?

Thank you!

Sorry, vifX.Y devices are 'fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff'. So long as the eth0 inside each domU is unique, you are ok.

Do you have any firewalls running? What does 'iptables-save' show on dom[013]?

--
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org

--
David Cemin
mobile: +55 51 93523097
home: +55 51 32763785
email: davidcemin@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Dom0-Domu Communication