On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:06 -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>
>
> With the “dd” command, try “iflag=direct” and “oflag=direct”. Use a
> reasonable buffer size, like bs=64k or so, to achieve a faster copy
> operation.
>
It looks like this may depend on the particulars of the storage devices
you have. For me, direct I/O was much slower, even much slower than
using "cp". But using dd with a 64k buffer size was a huge speedup over
"cp", thanks for the tip on that. The difference is marked enough that
it will probably be worth modifying my cloning script to copy this way
rather than straight cp.
This is using 5GB images, a hardware raid device running RAID-5 with
SCSI disks, and a DRBD-replicated file system:
root@vmi1 vmgroup1]# time cp paraivm.img test.img
real 0m46.174s
user 0m1.324s
sys 0m21.913s
[root@vmi1 vmgroup1]# time dd if=paraivm.img of=test.img bs=64k
80000+0 records in
80000+0 records out
5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 8.6259 seconds, 608 MB/s
real 0m8.646s
user 0m0.076s
sys 0m8.505s
[root@vmi1 vmgroup1]# time dd if=paraivm.img of=test.img bs=64k
iflag=direct oflag=direct
80000+0 records in
80000+0 records out
5242880000 bytes (5.2 GB) copied, 109.316 seconds, 48.0 MB/s
real 1m49.319s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m12.209s
--Greg
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home