|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was getting worried that by specifying 25G in both e2fsck and resize2fs
> that may have caused problems..
it is somewhat safer not to specify the size to resize2fs and let it
simply use the device's size.
otherwise, you expose yourself to slighly different interpretations of
'25G'. not too likely, but can you be sure that 24.78G is exactly the
same number of bytes to LVM and resize2fs?
--
Javier
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Boris Quiroz
- RE: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs,
Javier Guerra Giraldez <=
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
- RE: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jeff Sturm
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Simon Hobson
- RE: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
- RE: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Simon Hobson
- RE: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
- RE: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Simon Hobson
- Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs, Jonathan Tripathy
|
|
|
|
|