 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Why pv-on-hvm drivers?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Why pv-on-hvm drivers? |
| From: | Markus Schuster <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:29:19 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:30:58 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Followup-to: | gmane.comp.emulators.xen.user |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KNode/4.4.2 |
Hi list, I've read about recent efforts to push pv-on-hvm drivers to Linux mainline and I'm curious to know the cause for this. What's the advantage over using pv_ops directly and booting the kernel paravirtualized? Are there plans to move Linux domUs closer to the KVM way (from an architectural point of view)? Hope you can help. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Web management WITH high availability, Bart Coninckx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Step-by-step tutorial: Installing Xen 4.0.1 rpms on Fedora 13 with pvops Linux 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Why HVM?, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Why pv-on-hvm drivers?, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
