This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] XEN in VirtualBox?

To: Edson Marquezani Filho <edsonmarquezani@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] XEN in VirtualBox?
From: Juan Pablo Lopez Bergero <lopezjp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:36:46 -0300
Cc: lopb <servicios@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:28:34 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bpNDSlZSgnr4kOQjittsSWesS33k7SGUw0/uGZHMPog=; b=AY4zJGXhRwcVe4eWj1bZmfq3Cs2gvpyJnoZp+tjAReR0NaLbjLY4PxXgAa6Zb5B99E CHWZj+VMHEpruNnlv5JEBXUjZH5nW7fcoGOLtqtYZQKcsB03pgvLpoTF1CxY6PbJerE8 znja9YFZz5rhLLVfvkX7EX2v7UdpBJh/Rp7VU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=YrBIXrQkQqu5hK95U2NKwCdUpjC5PxYZPIataGBnb6OXtAz5+45oVx5OCQ+gO7KfqZ AYtY2SfQs3g4SPoZlcFvZ1fgPWDc20oANzVxVXt5nQ/mkBSIq15FYuh06phHkX7P0v/G Q/oZLGk4r3UGohqj5KAdAcu1u8wLI/t9wp9VM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTik8nGAA8RApTkzgLkY6++gKW5WuxaT0ouAxFxb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47B6BBF0.1040304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <29356491.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikD-vkVdnVAxc2MJ83zE54CJd3VTwzqHqz=AER6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim2fwDpBiHq-9Hk5Rf4OuPkj+aog5F0fw8tXSUx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim1kz9bpbeFz+B7yJnmARB_vCwdG3_a2v2zH6My@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTik8nGAA8RApTkzgLkY6++gKW5WuxaT0ouAxFxb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Juan Pablo Lopez Bergero
<lopezjp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Edson Marquezani Filho
> <edsonmarquezani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:10, Juan Pablo Lopez Bergero
>> <lopezjp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I see, thanks.
>> > Ok, now i'm moving xen to another PC.
>> > One last question,
>> > It is possible to run a domU with a 2.2kernel? Or it can be done only with
>> > 2.6-xen kernel?
>> > Because i need to run an old machine with 2.2 kernel. Witch has some old
>> > modules that i can't make them work in a new kernel.
>> > thanks
>> >
>> Well, based only on my theorycal knowledge, I guess it would be
>> possible to run an old kernel like that in HVM mode
>> (full-virtualization, specific hardware technology required). So, you
>> can't expect a very good performance, as you would have in PVM mode
>> (paravirtualized), which is the point where Xen becomes more
>> interesting and competitive, by the way.
>> Obs: I'm not aware of a xen modified kernel of 2.2 or 2.4 generation.
> Mh, i see.
> Well, i thinks this will not work. Because i need pci pass through.
> And it does not work in full virtualizated mode.
> RIght?
> thanks again!
> --
> -----
> Juan Pablo Lopez Bergero
> Web: www.lopb.com.ar
> Cell: 15-3957-3455
This might work. Butt i have no idea of what to do :D

Juan Pablo Lopez Bergero
Web: www.lopb.com.ar
Cell: 15-3957-3455

Xen-users mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>