WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm

To: Aclhk Aclhk <aclhkaclhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] one busy vm affects other vm
From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:20:33 +0400
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:22:37 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TdhYt4rKmSJrwVeJ0nA3D6leYibfliBGSCFqIBAXiXk=; b=WvZF5T3t8nVTYvL3sbYZS/EfjACV348p/VlObJfRuIMIXwJgjEqsklYToMLd5JHLsr /ujsA9Ac1VUQKy9JqxkZHb23h74xlm4q3bPErDwmevwjy7+bxqHE6DRal5NF7ln3CGLW oAz41QE1DmUA7rle9tnztLy33l/cEFaMwChhM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Yh6Gx59CO8APFL33v/6A/sMw54CfDxnxQPMZCgIlHnvyNpTJoAZe5RUy3f0E+SB7JD Age5p6JGwrjDLluRQ45MuHKOr30UKfrXdreG1mrBSk8R5VCGXRCXrdVWuykxPFFYGykB RuXwoa4MCvQ2qKzFlYEh/2yjUHulGhBouwmXs=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <362931.38760.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <362931.38760.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well I saw those problems when running cpuburn... After few iteration I
solve it (not sure) by using CPU cap 99%.

В Срд, 04/08/2010 в 04:25 -0700, Aclhk Aclhk пишет:
> the affected VMs are all linux (centos 5.4) hvm but windows (win2k)
> hvm not affected.
>         I am using Xen 3.1.0 in centos 5.4
>         
>         I have one VM consuming 100% cpu  and all other VM (linux)
>         become very slow (no ssh and vnc access).
>         
>         I could access host via ssh but not VM. host cpu is about 95%
>         idle using dstat.
>         
>         Pls advise how to avoid this.
>         
>         
>          
>         
>         -----內含下列附件-----
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Xen-users mailing list
>         Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>