|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM 
| 
 From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 
behalf of Serge Fonville
 Sent: Mon 14/06/2010 16:53
 To: 
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and 
LVM
 
 
 
Hi
 >> I am going to get a storage server which will 
be connected to my Xen
 >> hosts via iSCSI/Ethernet. I wish to use LVM 
for the DomU disks. The
 >> storage server will have a RAID10 array, and 
2 Xen hosts will connect
 >> to this (Each will have a 50% share of the 
RAID10 array, space wise).
 >>
 >> What is the best way to go 
about this? Should I:
 >>
 >> a) Split the RAID10 array into 2 
partition on the storage server, and
 >> export 1 partition to each xen 
host, then let the Xen host manage LVM?
 >>
 >> 
or
 >>
 >> b) Do all LVM stuff on the storage server and export 
each LVM logical
 >> volume to the correct Xen hosts via iSCSI? Since 
each host could have
 >> around 100 VMs on it, that's a lot of iSCSI 
exporting!
 >>
 > If you export two "big luns" and do the LVM stuff 
on each Xens server
 > you will not be able to "switch" a VM from one 
server to the other (with
 > xm save/restore for example). With that setup 
a VM can only be started
 > on a specific server. Also you will have two 
LVM sets to manage.
 >
 > If you do all the storage management on your 
SAN migrate a VM from one
 > server to the other will be easy and even done 
"live". Also the storage
 > management will be "unified". The only problem 
could be the maximum
 > number of iSCSI Luns on yours SAN, but it often is 
greater than 127
 > distinct units.
 >
 > Ok thanks for the 
advice. So I think I shall go down the root of doing all
 > LVM stuff on 
the SAN.
 >
 > However, I think that I will need more than 127 virtual 
machines, so having
 > an iSCSI target per VM is probably not an 
option. Is there any other
 > solution for Ubuntu/Debian?
 
 Would 
it be an option to have one iSCSI target, used by multiple
 clients where only 
one clients accesses a directory at a time??
 that way it would be way easier 
to mgrate a vm from one host to another.
 
 HTH
 
 Regards,
 
 Serge 
Fonville
 
 --
 http://www.sergefonville.nl
 
 Convince 
Google!!
 They need to support Adsense over SSL
 https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=10528
 http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=1884bc9310d9f923&hl=en
 
 _______________________________________________
 Xen-users 
mailing list
 Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So you're saying that I could just have one bug LUN, which both 
xen hosts could connect to, and as long as each host didn't try to run the same 
DomU as the same time, I'd be ok? Is this safe and done in 
industry?
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, JP P 
RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM,
Jonathan Tripathy <=
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Serge Fonville
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Bart Coninckx
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI and LVM, Jonathan Tripathy
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |