Re: [Xen-users] Attempt to set up Libvirt 0.7.7 & Xen 4.0 Dom0 (

To:	"Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Attempt to set up Libvirt 0.7.7 & Xen 4.0 Dom0 (2.6.32.13) on top of F13 RC2
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 24 May 2010 21:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Mon, 24 May 2010 21:59:17 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1274763418; bh=t0d8LQXk5VPnJjUnPwqyBrJDwOKMg1DFz7ZgRl1Vc3M=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MfmSt+QvL6Kb1VNd8YDW8XFMfzGeLNeu04EcAIGZn9BH1+71ZeRWGZAN0ENC0Wwtj0/GsUqintNTcZYDws8WIV3LA+IMOTidzPdUYSrYKokR3vTa8NUoFu1D6mEv+/LOECbeCV5VLvl6GUHx/XfdOC1SWps+mSd/QcjQSy70rzE=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XIszmMeXo6UGftr0uLGO0Kquj5quoWzIEZXijYGJ9qHO7tXpVl5kq18iAbS1gnF4UMbY2VuhcunKuzBGQzRrdEl/8t5FOdo6Cog4lK0Lf9vxS1xSNSCM0Pnxth9s9HpwDGv8Xdhq/Bqa0nKVUyElZ1xmVD8kpY07RJT6yWQQ9EQ=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<AANLkTikmxRJb33o_U9DmmP6wbXufEzgFx0Wf-vCVS5-k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Not at all, i do recommend :-

http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/set-up-libvirt-0-7-7xen-4-0-on-top-fedora-13-rc2/

Boris.
P.S. I remember very well Solaris Nevada ( b70/b80) testing as PV DomU at native Xen 3.1 F8 Dom0 with xenified kernel ( not sure 2.6.21 or 2.6.24 ) . NAT worked for SNV guest just fine. I might be doing something not quite properly ( at Dom0) in meantime.

--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Attempt to set up Libvirt 0.7.7 & Xen 4.0 Dom0 (2.6.32.13) on top of F13 RC2
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 12:33 AM

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Boris Derzhavets
<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The most recent yum update has been run.
> Installed Xen 4.0 and Libvirt like on F12. Via my experience xend will hang for 5-7 min at startup and xen managed bridging will fail as well. This behavior stays the same under either 2.6.32.13 or 2.6.33.3 pvops kernels. At the same time PV guests might be unable to obtain IP via interface virbr0. Ubuntu Lucid official xenified installer fails with DHCP request been sent to virbr0 under 2.6.32.13 kernel.
> I've checked NAT bridge detection at Libvirt 0.7.1 & Xen 4.0 (2.6.32.13) on top of F12 and at Libvirt 0.7.0 & Xen 4.0 (2.6.32.13) on top of Ubuntu 10.04 Server. Looks like only RH's PV guests happily detect virbr0 during install and runtime ( coming out of the LAN to the Net). Ubuntu 10.04 xenified PV installer and any OSOL (<= 134) requires old style network bridge to Dom0.
>
> In particular on F13 , i have to disable all xen managed network bridging except
> (network-script /bin/true)
>
> # chkconfig NetworkManager off
> # chkconfig network on
> Manually create a bridge
> # service network start

... so, in short, you wouldn't recommend this combination for anything
other than testing?

--
Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Attempt to set up Libvirt 0.7.7 & Xen 4.0 Dom0 (2.6.32.1