|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 vs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 on debian 
| 
11.05.10 09:52, Israel Garcia пишет:
 
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tapas Mishra<mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
 
 From my experience I tell it will be better to use a newer version.A
day before yesterday my xen daemon failed to start.I am still tracing
it as what went wrong.Better use the xen-4 and compile the binary if
you want to use the latest version it will be better than what you
mentioned.
 
Hi Tapas,
So, you recommend me to install a fresh up2date debian without any of
this xen kernel, download xen-4 and compile it? Is this better than
used the latest kernel debian lenny brings from repos
(2.6.26-[1][2]-xen-amd64)?
I appreciate any information, experience about this of you guys.
 
In testing you can found linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64, it's easy 
backport to stable and nice work about month with self compiled xen-4.0 
WBR,
Dmitriy Sirant
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |