|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] usb passthrough
>
> I wonder why it's limited to 1.1 i would imagine that is a hard coded
> limit but given a faster system shouldn't the emulation be faster? Who
> could shed more light on why?
>
Well if it talks to the device in '1.1 mode' then the limit will still apply.
At a guess, maybe the 1.1 hardware interface is a bit simpler? I suspect that
they already implemented USB 1.1 to support the mouse and tablet interface, and
passthrough was not much harder, but 2.0/3.0 implementation would have been a
lot more work.
James
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, chris
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, Chris
- RE: [Xen-users] usb passthrough,
James Harper <=
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, Chris
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, chris
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, David Markey
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, chris
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- RE: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, chris
- RE: [Xen-users] usb passthrough, James Harper
|
|
|
|
|