> <mailto:
tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Presumably it was the "hat" part that they objected too? So
> choose something
> that is as far from a hat as possible, but still cowboy themed:
> "cowboyboot Linux"?
>
> Only similarity with "redhat" is that both end in the letter "t"
> ... the world will officially
> be crazy if the lawyers deem that to be infringing :-)
>
>
> I agree, but as an individual I don't have a good way to defend myself
> against Red Hat and their team of lawyers.
>
>
> How does version control in Fedora work? If you heard a rumor
> that fedora was building,
> installing and booting on x86 on some particular day: could you
> find out what versions
> of each package they used and replicate the setup? Or is it just a
> crapshoot and you
> get the latest of everything, so you take your chances that it
> wasn't broken between
> it working on x86 and you starting your build?
>
>
> In theory this would be possible but very difficult. Individual
> packages are versioned so if you knew what version of anaconda worked
> you could try that. I honestly don't have the time to put quite that
> much effort into this.
>
> On another note.... you work for Intel right? I had hear that Intel
> had been looking into hosting the koji server so we could have a
> _real_ Fedora ia64 again. Do you know anything about that?
>
>
> Dave
>
>