|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Issues with Xen and iptables
Rainer Sokoll schrieb:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 09:09:23PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
>> You might want to try changing the NAT conditions from using "-o eth2"
>> to simply using --source and --destination first, with MASQUARADE for
>> simplicity and easy-debugging. A colleague had some problems a while
>> back, turned out he uses the wrong interface for "-o".
>
> If I follow your instructions, I see the natted (yeah!) packets on
> vif0.1 - but nothing on eth2 (where the default route sits) - for both
> SNAT and MASQUERADE.
It is getting more strange:
brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
xenbr0 8000.000000000000 no
xenbr1 8000.00ff746a4f25 no vif0.1
peth1
vif1.0
tap0
As said, if I tcpdump on vif0.1, I see natted packets. But if I tcpdump
on xenbr0, I see the same packets, but not natted.
I worry that I am missing something fundamental :-(
Rainer
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] Issues with Xen and iptables,
Rainer Sokoll <=
|
|
|
|
|