On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:57 PM, 박은병 <peb1611@xxxxxxxxx
> #ifconfig -a (dom0)
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:cb:a5:dd:66
> inet addr:147.46.125.xx Bcast:126.96.36.199 Mask:255.255.255.0
> # ifconfig -a (domU)
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3e:1f:4f:46
> inet addr:192.168.1.101 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> and my domU configuration file
> vif = [ 'bridge=eth0' ]
ip = "192.168.0.101"
> netmask= "255.255.255.0"
> gateway = "192.168.0.1"
> I can found similar problem on internet, but I don't understand why does
> hoster's bridged setup is problematic.
First of all, are you using bridged setup or routed setup? If you use
bridge, you wouldn't need to specify ip, netmask, or gateway on domU
config file. Also, if using bridges setup, dom0 bridge IP address (in
your case it's called eth0) should be on the same segment as domU's
network interface. You're using two different segments.
Xen-users mailing listXen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttp://lists.xensource.com/xen-users