WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] easy high availability storage

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] easy high availability storage
From: Peter Braun <xenware@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:26:39 +0100
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Roland Frei <frei@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:27:21 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OkTR8+Ye2a3m10DHDSV2zFo2aa5+I+qE7jiLG4wauZs=; b=B3bvvVJeXN6/WpumqTavQAPC+QjpsWmi+mBkxIFBEJzvpQf7GOt+i8T9C7qJf7zfHQ 1siTbJTUxyu6jdsGcbam6UOd/UARrf2bP2ST5desqxm+EEN0uCrWEGGHVzqYoOzcmXQ2 GASWC2qigWP9yLXOQnRUXBIKZntUmUHgCNzjs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TfzjlJIUUdkOZH7FG9K8E5umbeYXt6RMqpZsaviO5+3fN1GIDav09srEGjIVJX7Ptt vBef9hEC1e7rC6etOCtsx8/PD5UKG07j6SncJ8vESY7A8jj0Phnjq5c3Nk+JmNMCtDka 71PTWUT9AOTs3gFZQpKG6M2RZ9SdAU57wLy4Q=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7207d96f0911251917x7b30575fj7dc0534bcf16fed5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <op.u3wq0lzpcwzw3p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1259081515.2241.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.u3x0s8axcwzw3p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0911250114p1b4db8f3y26b053f926f08bcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <acbf498f0911250201h30a3a9b5lf1fdb59637780e7d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0911251917x7b30575fj7dc0534bcf16fed5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

its not my document.

Actually Ive tried to install H/A SAN according do this document but
without success.

Am looking for opensource solution of H/A SAN - and this is close to my goal.


The basics:

1)    2 machines with some HDD space synchronized between them with DRBD.

2)    Now am little bit confused what shall I use above the DRBD block device?
       - some cluster FS like OCFS2 or GFS?
       - LVM?

3)    create files with DD on cluster FS and export them with iSCSI?
       create LVM partitions and export them with iSCSI?

4)    how to make iSCSI target highly available?
       - configure   iSCSI on virtual IP/another IP and run it as HA service
       - configure separate iSCSI targets on both SAN hosts and
connect it to Xen server as multipath?

5)    hearbeat configuration

VM machines with iSCSI HDD space on SAN should survive reboot/non
availability of one SAN hosts without interruption nor noticing that
SAN is degraded.

Is that even possible?


Thank for your comments


Peter Braun

2009/11/26 Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Peter Braun <xenware@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> take a look at this document
>>
>> http://communities.vmware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/10964-102-2-9835/ha_san_how-to.pdf;jsessionid=12BC07515EE5DB61AEFA58BA9251110D
>>
>> Its describing building highly-available SAN iSCSI storage on ubuntu.
>
>
> It's great to see a how-to for this kind of setup, but here's two
> comments from me:
> - using GFS2 with fence "manual" is, AFAIK, asking for trouble. One of
> the reasons I chose OCFS2 is that it can work without fencing (at
> least better than GFS), and it can automatically reboot itself when it
> detects "something wrong that can cause inconsistency" .
> - if you're sharing using iscsi target, it might be easier (and also
> much better performance) to simply use LVM-backed LUNs instead of
> file-backed LUNs. Thus you only need clvm.
>
> If you've already implement this setup and have good result (e.g. it
> works fine when you yank some power cords or ethernet cables) please
> share your experience :D
>
> --
> Fajar
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users