|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Will pv-ops dom0-patched kernel be eventuall
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:29:00PM +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> After reading the following articles, it doesn't sound very hopeful for
> Xen.
>
> [1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors
>
> [1]http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html
>
> [2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors
>
> [2]http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html
>
> [3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux Foundation*s Small-Minded View of
> Virtualization
>
> [3]http://windowsconnected.com/blogs/brad/archive/2009/04/17/xen-vs-kvm-the-linux-foundation-s-small-minded-view-of-virtualization.aspx
>
> What are your views? I certainly hope that pvops dom0 patches would be
> merged into the mainline Linux kernel.
>
Jeremy will have a speech about pv_ops dom0 status at the XenSummit Asia
2009 this month.
I guess then we'll know more about the plans :)
http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2009/11/04/xen-summit-asia-2009-event-information-released/
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|