| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Max. PV and HVM Guests
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 03:24:59PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 09/11/2009 15:17, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> Furthermore, while I'm not
> >> Linux developer and so not familiar with how Linux calculates buffering
> >> and caching, I do know that my Linux systems dynamically manage buffers
> >> and caches, and when memory is reduced or some application requires a
> >> larger amount of physical memory, Linux reduces the amount of data in
> >> buffers and caches.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, it has to do with sizing the network buffers, caches etc..
> >
> > It shouldn't _crash_, so Teo is seeing some bug I believe. But it has
> > always been "best practice" to limit dom0 memory - and prevent weird
> > things happening later (like "memory squeeze in netback driver").
>
> The issue is not really kernel data like network buffers and buffer cache.
> It is kernel memory metadata -- primarily the per-page info structure that
> the kernel maintains. The metadata doesn't get shrunk with memory size when
> ballooning out, hence it increases as a proportion of memory still assigned
> to the domain. That really is significant when aggressively ballooning down
> a large-memory domain.
>
Ok, thanks. That makes sense.
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home