This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-users] AMD-V or VT

To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] AMD-V or VT
From: "Brian P. Martin" <Brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:31:47 -0700
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:32:28 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090807153047.593471993D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20090807153047.593471993D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcoXdArmGs6TUkrVSdqm7tctzWckGgAD//tw
> VT currently because you get PCI Pass-through support. New DDR3
> Opterons
> will offer PCI Passthrough later this year but I assume you are buying
> now.

Does that mean that current and older Opterons *can't* pass a PCI device
through to a guest, or that they don't do it as efficiently as on the Intel
VT machines?  I've been pulling my hair out trying to get a fully
virtualized guest access to a PCI card on an Opteron 1220.

Xen-users mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>