This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Re: [quagga-users 10975] Re: Quagga on Xen - Latency / B

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 05:06:14PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:19:44PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:57:04PM -0400, Alexis Rosen wrote:
> > > But the question is still of significant importance to a lot of Quagga  
> > > users. Thus, I suggest that it is an appropriate topic for the list.
> > > 
> > > Here's my earlier reply, which I (again, damnit) failed to send to the  
> > > list from an authorized address:
> > 
> > Well i haven't tried xen myself, but from what I hve read I/O
> > performance is not as fast as native would be.  kvm seems to be the only
> > virtualization system with just about native I/O speed.  paravirt is
> > close too, but requires of course a paravirt compatible guest.
> > 
> Getting a bit offtopic, but I believe Xen paravirt guests are still faster 
> on I/O speed than KVM guests (using virtio drivers), based on recent IBM 
> benchmarks.

Well I haven't tried xen.  I am certainly not complaining about the
speed of kvm though.  The e1000 emulation is very fast and works well
enough for my needs.

And I did mean paravirt was close to native hardware speed, not that it
was close to kvm speed.

Len Sorensen

Xen-users mailing list