 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Best Practices for PV Disk IO?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Best Practices for PV Disk IO? |
| From: | Christopher Chen <muffaleta@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:26:15 -0700 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:26:52 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8MhyLOo8aICDou2bJit+sd4ElL2MMYAPDNMlNNKH6h0=; b=KHPZb/1ilUSMT+3UKAT3Ba1Z/jcoEzICIq7mMyd/3Ifxu/K/6VdUV8PrseKnCzsKaZ l862kntcp3woa2foh5PCBdhQaRfqBRfjCnNdZZnaaAj8+V5BgaIwrkdSfsIqNrRnqm+a EPjaUZFhWh4Jz4jnDW/fL/fdu8MKn4PPl7GS4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=qIq4+Qx3f21VDY+SwkR+HwM7ck4N6eDw1fvBeVQ46Mc/B0PzzSBmYyRDK42IJPhKKJ rxJRRAQqsR01lg2q4uInL+M4NWRKmrB0jO9kcMtLFK/CFOCkr7aHGdfPmNgNkYgsdQCM VVBor1W4H9i7GP5x8t0ICiQeWv7OiE0q/Ag3M= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I was wondering if anyone's compiled a list of places to look to reduce Disk IO Latency for Xen PV DomUs. I've gotten reasonably acceptable performance from my setup (Dom0 as a iSCSI initiator, providing phy volumes to DomUs), at about 45MB/sec writes, and 80MB/sec reads (this is to a IET target running in blockio mode). As always, reducing latency for small disk operations would be nice, but I'm not sweating it. I just wondering if anyone's experienced similar behavior, and if they've found ways to improve performance. Cheers cc -- Chris Chen <muffaleta@xxxxxxxxx> "The fact that yours is better than anyone else's is not a guarantee that it's any good." -- Seen on a wall _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] SATA drives will not start under xen, Chris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Default kernel & initrd in Suse, cmasmas cmasmas |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] News - Microsoft Submits Drivers for Paravirtualization, Nathan Eisenberg |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] Best Practices for PV Disk IO?, Jeff Sturm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
