|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance- 
| Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files? 
 When I check the guest OS
 
 [root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l
 
 Disk /dev/xvda1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes
 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders
 Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
 
 Disk /dev/xvda1 doesn't contain a valid partition table
 
 Disk /dev/xvda2: 268 MB, 268435456 bytes
 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 32 cylinders
 Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
 
 Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table
 [root@localhost ~]#
 
 Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-,
fmb fmb <=
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |