[Xen-users] Re: Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux

To:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-users] Re: Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 07:15:41 -0400
Bcc:	tytso@xxxxxxx
Cc:	jeremy@xxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, npiggin@xxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Spector <stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx>, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ksrinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gregkh@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:02:54 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4A263DD3.3090901@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to:	Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksrinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Spector <stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx>, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxx
References:	<20090602232843.GA6577@xxxxxxx> <793c2ffe-16d3-4e6c-9cd2-32fa089e46a3@default> <20090603024311.GZ31943@xxxxxxx> <4A26263A.7010809@xxxxxxxxxx> <20090603094753.6eb32099@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A263DD3.3090901@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:09:39AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 06/03/09 10:47, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Linux is not the only player here.  NetBSD can run as dom0 guest.
>>> Solaris can run as dom0 guest too.  Thus making the dom0/xen interface
>>> private to linux and xen isn't going to fly.
>>
>> It does not however preclude fixing the dom0 interface.
>
> It wasn't my intention to imply that.  The interface can be extended  
> when needed.  PAT support will probably be such a case.  Changing it in  
> incompatible ways isn't going to work though.

But that means that if there is some fundamentally broken piece of
dom0 design, that the Linux kernel will be stuck with it ***forever***
and it will contaminate code paths and make the code harder to
maintain ***forever*** if we consent to the Xen merge?  Is that really
what you are saying?   Be careful how you answer that....

                                          - Ted

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: Merge Xen (the hypervisor) into Linux