WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] MSSQL and Xen performance

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:22:26AM -0700, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> Damn you, Centos, for your old repository versions.  
> I'd highly recommend looking at a newer version of XEN than 3.1 - there have 
> been some major performance gains since then.

It's not standard Xen 3.1. 
Redhat backported many patches from xen-unstable to Xen 3.1.2 in RHEL5/CentOS5.

-- Pasi

> 
> Best Regards
> Nathan Eisenberg
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Atlas Networks, LLC
> support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://support.atlasnetworks.us/portal
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of blackc2004
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:47 AM
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] MSSQL and Xen performance
> 
> 
> Thanks everyone for the tips!
> 
> Unfortunately I didn't get to "pick" the consultants, they came with the
> company that is doing our new ERP installation. So far I have not been happy
> with the way things are going.
> 
> I am running:
> Xen 3.1.2-128.1.6.el5
> CentOS 5.2
> PowerEdge 2970 (2) Quad Core Opteron 2344HE, 4x512K Cache 1.7GHz, 1Ghz
> HyperTransport
> 
> I have given 5 VCPUs and 4 gigs of RAM to the MSSQL Server, I was planning
> on increasing that within the next week.
> 
> The storage backend is via iSCSI to an Equallogic PS5000.
> 
> Since this is a brand new MSSQL installation (and we have never had one
> before), I do not know what the load will look like for us.
> 
> I have been noticing some network performance issues in early testing and
> will be implementing some changes to the severs this weekend to see if those
> are resolved. I will also be looking into the GPLPV which have been
> suggested!
> 
> Thanks again
> 
> 
> Dustin Henning wrote:
> > 
> > Another important note regarding using Windows on Xen:
> > I am pretty sure that using multiple CPUs causes severe performance loss
> > with the GPLPV drivers provided by James Harper (to the extent that having
> > one VCPU with the drivers may net better performance than having
> > multiple).
> > However, I believe the GPLPV drivers still provide better performance with
> > multiple vcpus than not having the drivers would.  This information could
> > be
> > slightly dated, but I believe it was recently mentioned by someone else on
> > the list.  Regardless, some testing of your scenario options would be duly
> > diligent.
> >     Dustin
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/MSSQL-and-Xen-performance-tp23435695p23448294.html
> Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users