Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging

To:	"Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging
From:	Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:12:52 +0530 (IST)
Cc:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:45:10 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1237470173; bh=0xLAR+X8UJvyumNi25AQwqmqB8Q5KeBd8hD7hIiwM/s=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GwDG8cLqDLM/wSPpjf7uH7BpXlsBEDqRLYMhKH1AJZ6VQ1PPNO+6VwMRGDBPFjwTkNwoLHedZPGeGwaYi78cAIW0bfHWP5qBH7CZL5OBSrVb6y8ZyQBO5KMTFjdhhTt9AQbcNRHH6N8LEeQia6JXnSYhmMvOI85hqCa7j4weOCM=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ccZRAUmbMVytlNfmbkiN3/GjerQxSBQl5FOnrnSMsfC5gSeRFVQ7arLQ1+c9VLlEWbx9CdxCDb285yVDqf/ZaoA83/TgIC4+rqtdbKG6nQrYG+zF0Dw0cDIA705FUR/jBfwzRWduhk6gjXU4ZIYVHkrmsaRd0fOCLOdN/6EioMc=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

what if i use Vyatta's product VC5 for VM to VM communication?

Fasiha Ashraf

--- On Thu, 19/3/09, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging
To: "Fasiha Ashraf" <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, 19 March, 2009, 6:19 PM

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It causes much overhead in case of virtualizing wireless networks thats why!

Ah, wireless :)
It's not simply overhead, bridging a wireless interface (AFAIK) won't work.

One option is network-route
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-740e3cf58c2ac48051f74c4f72cc6df52117e87e
I believe you need to setup NAT manually to allow domU to access
outside world using this method.

The other option is go with what redhat does. Using libvrtd, they
create another bridge called virbr0. You can put domU's vif on that
bridge and it will behave similar to Vmware's NAT networking (NAT and
dhcp is configured automatically). Note that the bridge is on virbr0,
not on the wireless interface.

Regards,

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more! Click here.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] To avoid Bridging, Fasiha Ashraf Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging, Fajar A. Nugraha Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging, Fajar A. Nugraha Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging, Fasiha Ashraf <= Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging, Fajar A. Nugraha Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging, Nick Couchman

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] To avoid Bridging