This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Removing Citrix PV Drivers and then installing GPLPVdriv

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Removing Citrix PV Drivers and then installing GPLPVdrivers
From: Mark Pace <pace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:16:14 -0800
Cc: Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:16:58 -0800
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; t=1233965774; x=1234570574; s=1jc; d=jolokianetworks.com; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; b=HQREo+NulVvauVsGSf3x/Igtam2cgmoEPI/97AmVCzu4Iys3tK8/AA6dX2D+ez+MEL8nBM+O6ieDw1e74dwLqw==
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550713@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=5EB4D52D; url=hkp://pgp.mit.edu
References: <498C2C80.3060807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550710@trantor> <498CD09A.20005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550713@trantor>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20081209)
> Any suggestions for a prefix? I am in the middle of some pretty major
> changes (going back to WDF again :) so changing the prefix now wouldn't
> be out of the question at this point. Given that pretty much nobody sees
> it if everything is working properly, I'm thinking XenGPLPV\xxx\999 etc.
> No chance of a clash there.
If there is no chance you'll be blossoming the driver to become a set of
drivers that can cover more than Xen (KVM?) someday then I like XenGPLPV
(easy to find, tells you what it is, can find it with either Xen or
GPLPV, etc).  Please excuse the thought if they are so different that
you'd never consider something like that...


Xen-users mailing list